Education · head-to-head
AsapSCIENCE VS 
coilbook™ | Learning For Children
Two education channels, compared on the numbers that actually move a video rather than subscriber vanity. AsapSCIENCE sits at 11M subscribers with a typical 1.0M views per upload; coilbook™ | Learning For Children at 5.9M with about 19M. Below is the full head-to-head plus the titles that win for each.
On this data coilbook™ | Learning For Children is the stronger performer of the two - it wins on both consistency (a 36% hit-rate, i.e. how often an upload beats 2x its own median) and reach (19M median views). The other channel isn't behind on size so much as on how reliably its uploads land.
| Metric | AsapSCIENCE | coilbook™ | Learning For Children |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 11M | 5.9M |
| Median views / video | 1.0M | 19M |
| Hit-rate (beats 2x median) | 31% | 36% |
| Top-video share | 48% | 46% |
| Est. ad revenue / mo | $3K–$10K | $12K–$49K |
| Uploads / week | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Typical length | 7 min | 10 min |
| Started | 2012 | 2011 |
The words that keep showing up in each channel's winning titles differ too: AsapSCIENCE leans on shut off, fall asleep, happens quit, song memorize, while coilbook™ | Learning For Children leans on real city, city heroes, heroes rch, sergeant cooper. Open either channel for the full breakdown of what wins versus flops.