The Science of Self-Care - what's actually working, and what isn't
Most stats sites hand you a subscriber count and an earnings guess. Neither answers the question that matters: which titles win on this channel, which flop, and what a creator should copy. Here is that read, from its 106 most recent of 130 long-form uploads. One of the education YouTube channels we track. Visit The Science of Self-Care on YouTube →
How many views does The Science of Self-Care actually get?
This channel runs on hits: its top 10% of videos pull 77% of all views and its biggest is 233.3× the median, so the median upload (18K views) is the floor and the big numbers are the exception.
What is The Science of Self-Care's most popular video?
Its biggest hit is "I walked 20,000 steps a day for 30 days - it worked!" at 4.2M views - 233.3× the channel median. The other top performers:
| Video title | Views |
|---|---|
| I walked 20,000 steps a day for 30 days - it worked! | 4.2M |
| From rosacea + acne to glass skin - this skincare works | 1.5M |
| I tried a Vibration Plate for 6 months - is this legit?? | 1.2M |
Which titles work best for The Science of Self-Care - and which flop?
Same channel, same audience. The gap between these two lists is the title doing the work. Its strongest titles:
And the uploads that underperformed for this channel:
The words that win for The Science of Self-Care
These show up across its winners but barely in its flops - the angles this audience actually clicks: months years.
Which title patterns actually move the needle
Not a guess - the real view lift of each pattern across 106 uploads: median views with it versus without. This isolates the title from the topic, so you copy what works here and skip what does not - something no other tracker breaks down per channel.
Lean on has a number and asks a question - they lift views the most on this channel. Go easy on short title (≤6 words).
What keywords does The Science of Self-Care rank on?
Weighted by views, the topics this channel actually pulls traffic on are: vibration plate, glass skin, heal gut, expert sarah, sarah greenfield, red light, light therapy, years learned. These are the lanes it owns - and the ones a similar channel competes against.
How often does The Science of Self-Care post, and when?
The Science of Self-Care publishes about 0.3 videos a week, most often on Sun.
How long are The Science of Self-Care's videos?
Typical uploads run about 14 minutes. Broken down by length, its 20 min+ videos perform best (30K median views) - the format worth leaning into on this channel.
How does The Science of Self-Care compare to other education channels?
At 18K median views, The Science of Self-Care sits below the typical education channel we track (23K) - there is headroom.
How much does The Science of Self-Care make? (estimated)
Nobody outside the channel sees the real figure, and ad revenue is only part of it - sponsorships and merch often dwarf it. But from public view counts, The Science of Self-Care pulls roughly 23K long-form views a month from recent uploads, which at a typical $1-4 RPM works out to an estimated $23-$93 a month in ad revenue (about $279-$1,115 a year). Treat it as a ballpark, not a payslip - real creator income varies wildly, and this ignores the back catalogue.
What should a channel like The Science of Self-Care make next?
Copy what already works here, not generic advice: lean on the 20 min+ format, ship on Sun, and build titles around its proven words (months, years). The median is the bar - the goal of every upload is to clear 18K views.
The Science of Self-Care stats at a glance
| Subscribers | 239K |
| Total views | 14M |
| Videos published | 130 |
| Avg views (of 106 analyzed) | 127K |
| Engagement rate | 4.8% |
| Uploads per week | 0.3 |
| Typical length | 14 min |
| On YouTube since | 2018 (8 yrs) |
Want this read on your own channel?
See which of your titles win, which topics are rising in your niche, and whether an idea will beat your own median - free.
Analyze your channel - free →Public YouTube data for The Science of Self-Care, analyzed by TubeHunter. We show the read, not a guarantee - titles are one lever, not magic.